Join Grant Dixon, mountaineer & wilderness photographer, for an evening of photo stories featuring four seasons in the mountains of Canada, Japan, NZ and Tasmania.
When: 11 August 2016, 6:30pm
Where: Arts Lecture Theatre, UTAS
This event is a fundraiser for the Tasmanian National Parks Association. For more information, click here.
The latest edition of the EDO Bulletin has the low down on new Federal and State Ministers, progress towards a new Management Plan for Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area, charges laid against the owner of dogs who killed little penguins in northern Tasmania and opportunities to have your say about Tasmania’s climate laws, heritage laws and transport policies.
To subscribe to the Bulletin, click here
The latest report from EDO NSW looks at the importance of providing opportunities for merits review in the planning system. As Tasmania continues with planning reforms, the report is a good reminder that third party appeals can lead to better environmental and social outcomes and decisions based on ecologically sustainable development.
To read the report, click here.
Check out the latest Bulletin for updates on the Aboriginal Relics Act 1975, withdrawal of plans to expand the Freycinet Lodge, further delays to bans on broadscale clearing on private land and much more.
Happy NAIDOC Week, everyone!
Flood risks, election promises, a new Mining Minister, recovery plans, events and plenty of opportunities to have your say. Check out our latest Bulletin for all the news.
The Government has announced its intention to make changes to the way that salmon farms are regulated in Tasmania. Key aspects announced include:
- Responsibility for environmental management will be transferred from the Marine Farming Branch to the EPA
- Increasing penalties for breaches
- Imposing a new industry levy to increase resources available to Government for assessment and monitoring.
EDO Tasmania has been a strong advocate for greater independence and rigour in the monitoring and enforcement of marine farming activities. We look forward to hearing more detail about the proposed changes, but we’re cautiously optimistic that the changes will improve oversight of the salmon industry.
To find out more about the proposed changes, click here.
Critically endangered species and ecological communities should be afforded the strongest possible protection under Australia’s national environmental laws. Currently, inclusion of a threatened species or ecological community in the category representing the highest level of endangerment under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 does little to increase the protection provided.
A new EDO Tasmania report, commissioned by the Bob Brown Foundation, outlines options to strengthen our national laws to more effectively manage the threat of extinction faced by listed species. Key reforms include:
- Streamlining assessment decisions
- Automatic ‘uplisting’ of species included on the IUCN Red List in the category of Critically Endangered
- Emergency listing powers for at-risk species and communities
- Requiring the Minister to act on advice from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee to list a species or community as Critically Endangered.
- Commonwealth, State and Territory threatened species assessment criteria must be synchronised to allow for reciprocal recognition of assessments
- Strengthening recovery actions
- Recovery plans to be developed or reviewed within 6 months of a species or ecological community being listed as critically endangered
- Recovery plans must identify critical habitat for the species, to be entered on the Critical Habitat Register
- Recovery plans must include clear performance indicators, and the Department of Environment must report against these indicators in its annual report
- Funding programmes should prioritise proposals that will further the survival of critically endangered species
- Avoiding impacts
- Any adverse impact on a critically endangered species or ecological community, including any adverse impact on listed critical habitat, should be considered “significant”
- Requiring the Minister to follow advice from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee regarding proposed actions which may impact on a critically endangered species or ecological community
- Powers to vary or revoke an approval where a threatened species or ecological community impacted by an activity is ‘uplisted’ to Critically Endangered
- Extend the obligation to protect critical habitat to all land tenures
- Repeal the RFA exemption
- Remove the exemption so the Commonwealth Minister can regain control over one of the key drivers of habitat loss for critically endangered species
- Encouraging strong action by State and Territory governments
- Encourage the Tasmanian government to implement agreed restrictions on broadscale clearing on private land
- Use COAG reforms to promote implementation of best practice laws for the protection of threatened species across the country, including through planning and building laws
To read the full report, click here.
Why are Australian sites left out of the latest UNESCO Climate Change World Heritage report? How is Tasmania’s faring in the renewable energy race? Where can you find out what election candidates think about nature laws? Why do our Aboriginal heritage laws need an urgent rethink? How many submissions did the Tasmanian Planning Commission receive on the draft State Planning Provisions? Find out in the latest edition of the EDO Bulletin.
To subscribe to the Bulletin, click here
Biodiversity conservation underlies both economic and ecological sustainability, supports health and well-being and builds resilience against a changing climate. The theme for International Biodiversity Day 2016, “Mainstreaming Biodiversity“, is a reminder that biodiversity considerations need to be integrated across a wide range of government, business and individual decisions.
Here are our suggestions on five key things the Federal Government can do, the State Government can do, and we can all do, to mainstream biodiversity and improve biodiversity conservation in Tasmania:
All of us
And, one last thing we can all do… donate to local and national organisations working to protect biodiversity (including EDO Tasmania!)
Earlier this week, it was revealed that Shree Minerals had failed to comply with a requirement to move approx 80,000 cubic metres of potentially acid-forming mine waste (currently stored aboveground) into an in-ground pit by 8 May 2016. Today, the EPA Director confirmed that it has not taken enforcement action, and that Shree Minerals now intends to apply for a new permit to authorise the ongoing aboveground storage of the mine waste.
The original assessment by the EPA Board in 2012 concluded that in-ground storage was the only environmentally sound way to manage waste at Shree’s Nelson Bay River iron ore mine. In 2014, the Supreme Court rejected an amendment allowing aboveground storage, which led to the orders requiring the waste to be moved in-pit by May 2016.
To read the EPA’s statement, click here.